Primary Draf III procedure and pansinusitis patients

Comparison of Outcomes of Primary Draf III Procedure and Standard Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Pansinusitis Patients

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20230101057007N1

Enrollment

Registered

2023-04-04

Start date

2020-10-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Condition 1: chronic pansinusitis. Condition 2: Chronic sinusitis. Condition 3: Nasal polyp. Condition 4: Anosmia. Condition 5: Asthma. Chronic pansinusitis Chronic sinusitis Nasal polyp Anosmia Asthma

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Patients with pansinusitis and anosmia get the following surgeries

extended antrostomy, anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy, sphenoidotomy, and Draf III. Intervention 2: Control group: Patients with pansinusitis and anosmia getting the following surgeries

extended antrostomy, anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy, sphenoidotomy, and DrafIIA.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria include anosmia and pansinusitis patients with asthma or NSAID hypersensitivity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: history of sinus surgery diagnosis of nasal cavity or sinus tumor type of fungal sinusitis absence of frontal sinus

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before intervention), and one month, three months, six months, and one year after the intervention. Method of measurement: Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) questionnaire.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactShabahang Mohammadi

Iran University of Medical Sciences

mohammadi.sh@iums.ac.ir+98 21 8214 1000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026