Investigating the Effectiveness of the PEP Model on the Management of Volunteer Services for Nursing Students

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Voluntary Service Management with the Conventional Method and the PEP (Personal Preparation, volunteer Engagement, and Program Perpetuation) Model on Its Outcomes in Nursing Students

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20221227056948N1

Enrollment

105

Registered

2023-01-17

Start date

2023-02-04

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Voluntary Service Management.

Interventions

Intervention 1: The first intervention group: management of voluntary services will be done in a conventional method without using a specific model or program. After participating in the call and comp

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 24 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Bachelor of Nursing students (boys and girls). Willingness to Participate and Continue Cooperation in the Volunteer Service Project Students of the 5th Semester and above Who Have Successfully Completed Adult and Elderly Nursing Units 1-2-3 Having an Age Range of 20-24 Years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having mental disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Motivation to volunteer. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: volunteer function inventory Clary et al (1998).;Attitude to voluntary service. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: Helping Attitude Scale.;Social Responsibility. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: Social responsibility questionnaire based on Carroll's model.;Intentions to volunteer. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire of intention to volunteer.;Clinical competence. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: Clinical Competence Questionnaire of Nursing Students Nahriri et al. 2018 (Adapted from Liu and Cheng competence tool).	—

Measure

Time frame

Motivation to volunteer. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: volunteer function inventory Clary et al (1998).;Attitude to voluntary service. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: Helping Attitude Scale.;Social Responsibility. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: Social responsibility questionnaire based on Carroll's model.;Intentions to volunteer. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire of intention to volunteer.;Clinical competence. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: Clinical Competence Questionnaire of Nursing Students Nahriri et al. 2018 (Adapted from Liu and Cheng competence tool).

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactZohre Vanaki

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University

vanaki_z@modares.ac.ir+98 21 8288 3814

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026