Condition 1: Malignant neoplasm of rectosigmoid junction. Condition 2: Nursing students' knowledge and skills in caring for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Malignant neoplasm of rectosigmoid junction Other specified counseling
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Intervention group: Students in the intervention group, in addition to receiving the basic educational content (similar to the control group), participate in three stages of an artific
Sponsors
Yazd University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Willingness to participate in the study Having a smartphone or laptop or easy access to a computer and the Internet Passing theoretical courses and internships in adult health nursing (surgical internal medicine) 1 to 3
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Students on leave or sick leave.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Mean score of nursing students' clinical reasoning. Timepoint: Measurement of the score of nursing students' clinical reasoning at the beginning of the study, before the intervention starts, and at the end of the study, one month after completing all intervention stages. Method of measurement: Nurses' Clinical Reasoning Scale.;Score of the quality of the nursing care plan developed by nursing students for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery with complex conditions. Timepoint: Measurement of the score of the quality of the nursing care plan developed by nursing students for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery with complex conditions one month after the intervention implementation in the fourth study stage. Method of measurement: Nursing care plan evaluation checklist. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Score of nursing students' specific clinical reasoning in caring for and managing patients following colorectal cancer surgery in the first version of the test, with and without using artificial intelligence tools. Timepoint: Measurement of the score of nursing students' specific clinical reasoning in caring for and managing patients following colorectal cancer surgery in the first version of the test without using artificial intelligence tools during the second intervention stage, after presenting simulation scenarios and before using artificial intelligence toolsMeasurement of the score of nursing students' specific clinical reasoning in caring for and managing patients following colorectal cancer surgery in the first version of the test with using artificial intelligence tools during the second intervention stage, after completing the test without artificial intelligence tools and with permission to use tools such as ChatGPT or Copilot. Method of measurement: Specific clinical reasoning test for caring for and managing patients following colorectal cancer surgery first version.;Score of the quality of prompt-writing by nursing students in using artificial intelligence tools for clinical scenarios related to caring for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Timepoint: Measurement of the score of the quality of prompt-writing by nursing students in using artificial intelligence tools for clinical scenarios related to caring for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery one month after the intervention implementation in the fourth study stage simultaneously with developing the nursing care plan. Method of measurement: Prompt-writing evaluation rubric.;Score of nursing students' satisfaction with the artificial intelligence-based educational intervention in caring for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Timepoint: Measurement of the score of nursing students' satisfaction with the artificial intelligence-based educational intervention in caring | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactFateme Bakhshi
Yazd University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed