Comparison of the outcome of pyloric drainage in pyloromyotomy and mikulicz pyloroplasty with not performing it in patients with lower esophageal cancer undergoing orringer surgery

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20221117056530N1

Enrollment

Registered

2023-02-06

Start date

2023-02-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal cancer. Malignant neoplasm of esophagus, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Esophagectomy alone which is the gold standard treatment of esophageal cancer. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Esophagectomy + pyloromyotomy in which the surgeo

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Undergoing total esophagectomy surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of previous laparotomy Deudenal ulcer in preoperative endoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Occurrence of clinical symptoms of delayed gastric emptying. Timepoint: 3 months after the operation. Method of measurement: History taking.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSamira Heidari Katayouncheh

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

samiraheydari2525@yahoo.com+98 31 3620 2020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026