Skip to content

The difference in full mouth implant placement in one session and multiple visits

Evaluation of clinical and serological responses after post full mouth implantation in single visit versus multiple visits

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20221110056464N1
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-01-15
Start date
2022-12-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant. Presence of tooth-root and mandibular implants

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Surgery and implant placement will be done in one session. The flap and the drilling protocol and placement will be done as standard and the healing abutment will b

Sponsors

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who need a full mouth implant Healthy gum condition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant and lactating women Having any systemic diseases such as diabetes Patients receiving antibiotics in the last six months Patients receiving corticosteroid drugs Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis rheumatism Addiction to drugs, smoking or alcohol History of head and neck radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Serum CRP and WBC levels. Timepoint: One day before implant placement and 48 hours after surgery and 7 days after surgery. Method of measurement: It will be done through blood tests of patients.;The amount of pain. Timepoint: 48 hours after surgery and 7 days after surgery. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale.;Wound healing rate. Timepoint: One week after surgery. Method of measurement: EHS (EARLY WOUND HEALING) evaluation will be done through three indicators: 1. Clinical signs of re-epithelialization (CSR) (score 0: visible distance between cut edges, score 3: contact between cut edges, score 6: Sticky cutting edges) 2. Clinical signs of hemostasis (CSH) (score 0: bleeding at the cut edge, score 1: the presence of fibrin at the cut edge, score 2: absence of fibrin at the cut edge) 3. Clinical signs of inflammation (CSI) (score 0: redness in More than 50% of the cut length and/or clear swelling, score 1: redness in less than 50% of the cut length, score 2: absence of redness during the cut). The sum of the scores of these three parameters will form the EHS score. Therefore, the EHS score for the ideal wound healing will be ten points, and a score of zero will indicate the worst EHS condition. The wound will be ten points. And a score of zero will indicate the worst EHS condition.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAtabak Kashefi Mehr

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

kashefimehr.perio@gmail.com+98 41 3344 4598

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026