Skip to content

CSF leak rate in Duraplasty using the Edge-In method and the conventional method

A comparative study of CSF leak rate in Duraplasty using the Edge-In method with the conventional method in patients with spinal cord injury

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20221108056446N6
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-02-17
Start date
2024-04-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal cord injury. Tuberculoma of brain and spinal cord

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Dura repair will be done by edge-In method using 0.4 Prolene thread. Intervention 2: Control group: Dora will be sewn conventionally with 0.4 silk thread and Simple

Sponsors

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age more than 18 years Not suffering from diseases that increase cranial pressure Informed consent of the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who have previous surgery in the current surgery site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Timepoint: Immediately after duraplasty surgery. Method of measurement: The function of the drain to check the leak of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMajid Rezvani

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

mui@mui.ac.ir+98 31 3668 0048

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026