Skip to content

Comparative Assessment of Standard of Care Intralesional Therapy Versus Combination of Thermal Therapy with Standard of care intralesional Therapy for skin lesions in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Pakistan

Comparative Assessment of Sodium Stibogluconate/Meglumine Intralesional Therapy Versus Combination of Thermal Therapy with Sodium Stibogluconate/Meglumine intralesional Therapy for skin lesions in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Pakistan

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20220529055013N2
Enrollment
132
Registered
2024-02-02
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Cutaneous leishmaniasis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Treatment group: In this group, the skin lesion of patient along with 2 cm border of healthy skin around the lesion will be disinfected with antiseptic, followed by administration of

Sponsors

TDR/EMRO /WHO
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
2 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis by direct examination under microscopy voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and complying with study follow-up visits will be considered for enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Other forms of Leishmaniasis i.e., mucocutaneous and/or visceral leishmaniasis (clinical exclusion) Patients already receiving treatment for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis• Known hypersensitivity to stibogluconate/meglumine antimoniate Pregnancy/lactation Comorbidities or other illness which may hinder the completion and follow-up of study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Assessment of treatment efficacy in terms of treatment response among both study groups, assessed after 4-6 therapy sessions. Timepoint: Week 0, week 4, Week 8, Week 12. Method of measurement: Treatment Response labelled as: Complete response (complete re-epithelialization, disappearance of edema, induration, and other signs of inflammation), Partial response (decrease in lesion size not more than 50%, without appearance of epidermal crease)• Failure to response (no re-epithelialization).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety adverse effects. Timepoint: 0week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks. Method of measurement: Assessment of treatment safety in terms of occurrence of known/unknown device and drug reactions/side effects at each follow-up visit. Safety assessment is defined as:• Local side effects o Redness, Itching, Burning, Blister formation, Oozing.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Public ContactNafisa Tahir

National University of Medical Sciences

dr.nafisa.tahir@gmail.com+92 51 9270175

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026