FindTrial
Sign In

Evaluation and comparison of the effectiveness of two methods of tension free surgical intervertebral medial autologous sling and synthetic vaginal sling in the correction of stress urinary incontinence

Evaluation and comparison of the effectiveness of two methods of tension free surgical intervertebral medial autologous sling and synthetic vaginal sling in the correction of stress urinary incontinence

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20211123053163N1
Enrollment
48
Registered
2023-04-29
Start date
2022-03-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary stress incontinence. Stress incontinence (female) (male)

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: People who undergo modified sling surgery. Intervention 2: Intervention group 2: This group includes 24 people and the patient's autologous tissue is used instead

Sponsors

Iran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: stress urinary incontinence

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Urinary tract infection during surgery Suspicion of urogenital malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The level of patient satisfaction in urinary control. Timepoint: 3 consecutive months after surgery. Method of measurement: Examination with a cough test and the number of pads used daily.—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Emami

Iran University of Medical Sciences

support@hkc.ir+98 21 8864 2444

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026