Skip to content

Modulating Treatment Expectations via Social Learning Before Motor Control Exercise in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Modulating Treatment Expectations via Social Learning Before Motor Control Exercise in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20211121053136N1
Enrollment
120
Registered
2025-06-20
Start date
2025-07-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

non-specific chronic neck pain. Cervicalgia

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Group 1: Motor Control Exercise + Positive Social Learning Interaction Prior to ExerciseParticipants in Group 1 will undergo a six-week, individually tailored motor

Sponsors

Kharazmi University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Men and women Aged between 18 and 65 years Persian-speaking (both written and spoken) Diagnosis of chronic neck pain (duration > 3 months) confirmed by a clinician Baseline Pain Intensity Score =3 on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Neck Disability Index (NDI) score = 20% (= 10/50)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Current or past addictive behaviors History of serious psychiatric disorders Pregnancy Participation in structured exercise > 30 min/week or rehabilitation in the past 3 months Serious spinal pathologies (e.g., tumor, infection, stenosis, herniated disc, mielopathy) and injuries (e.g., fracture, whiplash) History of spinal surgery Neurological or cardiovascular diseases Inflammatory or neuropathic neck pain Initiation of new medication within 6 weeks prior to the study Severe visual or auditory impairment interfering with protocol adherence.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 6 weeks), follow-up (T2, 3 months). Method of measurement: 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).;Disability. Timepoint: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 6 weeks), follow-up (T2, 3 months). Method of measurement: Neck Disability Index (NDI), 10 items scored 0–100%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Neck motion (kinematics). Timepoint: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 6 weeks), follow-up (T2, 3 months). Method of measurement: Motion analysis system.;Muscle activity. Timepoint: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 6 weeks), follow-up (T2, 3 months). Method of measurement: Surface EMG (sEMG).;Fear-avoidance beliefs. Timepoint: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 6 weeks), follow-up (T2, 3 months). Method of measurement: Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ):Fear-avoidance beliefs will be assessed using the Persian version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). This questionnaire consists of 16 items and evaluates fear-avoidance beliefs in two domains: work-related beliefs (FABQ-W) and physical activity-related beliefs (FABQ-PA). A score of 34 or higher (out of 42) on the FABQ-W indicates a lower likelihood of return to work within four weeks, whereas a score of 15 or higher (out of 24) on the FABQ-PA reflects fear-avoidance beliefs associated with physical activity. Previous studies on the Persian version of the FABQ have demonstrated acceptable reliability. The test-retest reliability of the FABQ, assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), was 0.88 for the FABQ-W and 0.82 for the FABQ-PA, confirming its reproducibility. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the FABQ in patients with neck pain has been reported as 9.5 points.;Self-efficacy. Timepoint: Baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 6 weeks), follow-up (T2, 3 months). Method of measurement: Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)The Persian version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) will be used to assess self-efficacy. This questionnaire consists of 10 items, with a total score ranging from 0 (no self-efficacy) to 60 (maximum self-efficacy). Higher scores indicate greater confidence and belief in one’s ability to perform daily activities despite pain, whereas lower scores reflect weaker levels of confidence and belief. The minimal cl

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFatemeh amirizadeh

Kharazmi University

F.amirizadeh@khu.ac.ir+98 937 342 8732

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026