Skip to content

Effect of the xenografting on the buccal soft tissue dimensions of the immediate implant

Dimensional changes of soft tissue following immediate flapless implant placement and provisionalization with or without xenograft: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20211115053065N1
Enrollment
34
Registered
2022-01-01
Start date
2022-01-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe gingival resorption after implant treatment in the maxillary cosmetic area.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: After extracting the specified tooth, the patients received a Dentium brand implant made in South Korea, the gap between the sucket buccal wall and the implant surf

Sponsors

Islamic Azad University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients prone to extract one of the maxillary anterior teeth in the cosmetic zone (number of teeth 14-24) and placement of immediate implants with provisionalization Continuation of the buccal wall bone of the extracted tooth socket with sufficient thickness after tooth extraction Existence of more than 2 mm gap between the implant and the socket buccal wall

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Periodontal disease Presence of systemic or local diseases that are opposed to implant placement (diabetes, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and osteoporosis) Pregnancy Cigarette and drug addiction Presence of acute infection at the implant site Patient undergoing radiotherapy Use of drugs that disrupt bone and gingival tissue repair Patients with parafunctional habits such as Bruxism or Clenching

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in the height of gingival tissue in the mesial, middle and distal areas of the buccal area of ??the implant from the edge of the gingival margin. Timepoint: 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after implant placement. Method of measurement: Periodontal probe with the help of stent and 15-end file with Rabrastop.;Changes in the thickness of the gingival soft tissue at intervals of 4 and 8 mm from the gingival margin in the mid buccal area of ??the implant. Timepoint: 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after implant placement. Method of measurement: Periodontal probe with the help of stent and 15-end file with Rabrastop.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction with implant treatment. Timepoint: 2 weeks and 6 months after implant placement. Method of measurement: questionnaire.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public Contactmehrnoosh meshkat alsadat

Islamic Azad University

taherehbitaraf@yahoo.com+98 21 2256 4571

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026