Evaluation of the consequences of back-and-forth method in spinal anesthesia in cesarean section

Comparative study of back-and-forth method with classical spinal anesthesia method in pregnant women who are candidates for cesarean section

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20211017052786N2

Enrollment

200

Registered

2022-03-07

Start date

2022-04-04

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Other complications of spinal and epidural anesthesia during pregnancy

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: The group in which the anesthesiologist routinely inserts a needle between the L4-L5 vertebrae, injecting 10 mg of bupivacaine 0.5% (C18H28N2O) after CSF was removed. In

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women Having ASA1 or ASA 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Drug addiction Patient dissatisfaction History of drug allergy to local anesthetics in previous surgeries History of high intracranial pressure Local infection at the site of needle entry

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Headache and nausea and vomiting after surgery. Timepoint: Days 1 and 2 after surgery. Method of measurement: Visual analog scale.;Pain medication required. Timepoint: Days 1 and 2 after surgery. Method of measurement: Mg of injected drug.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAmir Hossein Moradi Rafigh

Ghoum University of Medical Sciences

Amirmmr287@gamil.com+98 25 3885 6440

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026