Skip to content

Success of TUL under general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in patients with acute renal colic

Comparison of TUL outcome between general anesthesia and local spinal anesthesia in the acute renal colic patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20210905052383N1
Enrollment
59
Registered
2021-09-26
Start date
2021-09-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal acute colic. Calculus of kidney and ureter

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Spinal anesthesia group, which will be considered for patients with 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, which will be injected in a supine position with 25 spinal needles in

Sponsors

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age over 18 years All patients should be TUL candidates if there is ureteral stones. Written consent to participate in the project

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of TUL as mean time in urinary tract access, mean time to stone access, mean stone breaking time and completely stone-free status. Timepoint: During surgery. Method of measurement: Urinary tract access, mean time to stone access, mean stone breaking time and completely stone-free status.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative pain according to analog visual pain (VAS). Timepoint: 1 and 8 hours after surgery. Method of measurement: By analog visual analgesia (VAS).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAbdollah Arami

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

a.arami90.aa@gmail.com+98 51 3844 8750

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026