Comparison of the effectiveness of compassion-based emotion-focused combination therapy package with compassion-based therapy on quality of life in patients with primary headache symptoms

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20210901052355N1

Enrollment

Registered

2021-10-13

Start date

2021-09-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary headache. Migraine? Tension type headache? Cluster headache syndrome

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group1:Emotion-based therapy group is based on compassion. The experimental group or the first intervention received compassion-based emotion therapy therapy for 10 sessio

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Conscious satisfaction of the subjects and willingness to participate and continue to participate in treatment Being in the age group of 18 to 45 years according to the disability assessment questionnaire caused by headache Diagnosis of primary headache by a specialist and having a record Do not undergo parallel psychiatric and psychological treatments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Dissatisfaction and unwillingness to participate and continue to participate in treatment Do have secondary headaches Absence of three consecutive or non-consecutive sessions Undergo other psychiatric and psychological treatments.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
In the present study, the outcome variable is a quality of life score below 40 in the Quality of Ware & Sherbourne Questionnaire, which indicates a low quality of life. Timepoint: Before the intervention and 80 days later (completion of the intervention) and then 60 days later (follow-up). Method of measurement: The tool for measuring the outcome variable is the quality of Life Ware & Sherbourne Questionnaire. The quality of life variable is measured in three stages before the intervention, after the intervention (80 days after the start of the intervention) and in the follow-up stage (60 days after the end of the intervention). In the instrument of measuring the quality of life Ware & Sherbourne , the maximum scores are 100 and the minimum scores are zero. High scores mean high quality of life and low scores mean low quality of life.	—

Measure

Time frame

In the present study, the outcome variable is a quality of life score below 40 in the Quality of Ware & Sherbourne Questionnaire, which indicates a low quality of life. Timepoint: Before the intervention and 80 days later (completion of the intervention) and then 60 days later (follow-up). Method of measurement: The tool for measuring the outcome variable is the quality of Life Ware & Sherbourne Questionnaire. The quality of life variable is measured in three stages before the intervention, after the intervention (80 days after the start of the intervention) and in the follow-up stage (60 days after the end of the intervention). In the instrument of measuring the quality of life Ware & Sherbourne , the maximum scores are 100 and the minimum scores are zero. High scores mean high quality of life and low scores mean low quality of life.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr.Felor Khayatan

Isfahan Azad University

F.khayatan@yahoo.com+98 913 128 9531

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026