Skip to content

Evaluation of efficacy of combined topical Bimatoprost and Fractionated carbon dioxide laser versus Bimatoprost alone in treatment of alopecia areata

Evaluation of efficacy of combined topical Bimatoprost and Fractionated carbon dioxide laser versus Bimatoprost alone in treatment of alopecia areata patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20210715051895N1
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-09-21
Start date
2021-08-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alopecia areata. Alopecia areata

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Combination therapy with CO2 laser and topical bimatoprost.03%. How to use: Fractional CO2 laser treatment is performed once every two weeks for three months and i
fractional scanning mode
one pulse
spot size=15mm
power=5w
dwell time=500ms
smart stack=3
spacing=700microm
density8.7%
fluence=4.68j/cm2
energy=51.6mj . The patient will receive topical bimatoprost .03% (EXCILIA .03% 3ml sterile solution, IRAN, INOCLON) twice a day, with a cotton applicator in the area of alopecia patch for three month

Sponsors

Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Alopecia areata patients who have two similar alopecia patches on the scalp

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy lactation history of allergy to prostaglandin analouge Taking medication or treatment for the past three months that affects the hair cycle Uncontrolled systemic disease Non-patchy alopecia areata and involving area other than the scalp photosensivity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Alopecia patch area. Timepoint: at base line ,4,8,12,24 weeks later. Method of measurement: Measurement of hair regrowth rate by physical examination based on Salt score scale.;Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: 4,8,12,24 weeks later. Method of measurement: By 7point global-assessment patient satisfaction questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Erythema. Timepoint: 4,8,12 Weeks from the beginning of treatment. Method of measurement: By clinical examination and classification of severity of complications into mild, moderate and severe.;Scaling. Timepoint: 4,8,12 Weeks from the beginning of treatment. Method of measurement: By clinical examination and classification of severity of complications into mild, moderate and severe.;Skin dryness. Timepoint: 4,8,12 Weeks from the beginning of treatment. Method of measurement: By clinical examination and classification of severity of complications into mild, moderate and severe.;Pruritis. Timepoint: 4,8,12 Weeks from the beginning of treatment. Method of measurement: By clinical examination and classification of severity of complications into mild, moderate and severe.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSimin Shamsimeymandi

Kerman University of Medical Sciences

meymandi_s@hotmail.com+98 34 3132 8328

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026