Skip to content

Evaluation and comparison of anterior pelvic ring fixation

Evaluation and comparison of surgical results of pelvic fractures of APC type II and III by anterior pelvic plating method with anterior pelvic plating method and SI screw implantation in patients admitted to Ayatollah Kashani and Al-Zahra hospitals in Isfahan city

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20210614051574N15
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-11-15
Start date
2021-11-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic fracture. Multiple fractures of pelvis with unstable disruption of pelvic ring, initial encounter for closed fracture

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: Patients who are candidates for elective surgery due to unstable pelvic fracture, in this group, undergo anterior pelvic plating surgery. Intervention 2: Interven

Sponsors

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Confirming informed consent Age 18 to 80 years Unstable pelvic fracture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a fracture of the acetabulum, pubic ramus, and sacrum

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Union. Timepoint: 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Radiography.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Mirmiran

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

hatmysyd314@gmail.com+98 31 3668 0042

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026