Comparative study of surgical site infection incidence in patients with perforated peptic ulcer that undergo primary intention versus delayed primary(tertiary) intention

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20210508051227N1

Enrollment

Registered

2022-03-11

Start date

2022-02-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perforated peptic ulcer. Acute peptic ulcer, site unspecified, with perforation

Interventions

Intervention 1: In this group, delayed primary intention is performed. In this way, after the perforation is repaired, all the layers of the abdominal wall are closed after surgery, and only the skin

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with perforated peptic ulcer Presence of peritonitis clinical sign that confirmed by surgeon Presence of paraclinical findings that confirms peritonitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence underlying disease like HIV , Diabetes , hepatitis , collagen vascular disease Use antibiotics for one recent month Hospitalization for 3 recent month People with BMI more than 30 Using drugs like immunosuppressive or corticosteroid

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Incidence of surgical site infection. Timepoint: 14 days. Method of measurement: observation.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAli Toolabi

Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

ali.toolabi@yahoo.com+98 921 337 8018

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026