Skip to content

Hyperfractionated irradiation with and without concurrent chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

The comparison of treatment outcomes between Hyperfractionated irradiation with and without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20210404050835N1
Enrollment
112
Registered
2021-07-10
Start date
2021-07-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Malignant neoplasm of head, face and neck

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: receiving hyperfractionated irradiation with low dose concurrent chemotherapy. Patients in this group treating by hyperfraction radiation therapy, with a total dose

Sponsors

Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The response of the patient's cancer tissue sample is of squamous cell carcinoma of the mucosa (non-skin). The patient's cancer is locally advanced. The age of patients is at least 18 years and at most 75 years. The Karnofsky Performance Score of the patient is at least 60. The patient should have no evidence of distant metastasis. Not receiving previous radiation therapy and chemotherapy Failure to perform previous surgery on the tumor The patient is not pregnant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patient has synchronous primary lesion. Patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp and neck. Presence of underlying diseases such as diabetes and hypertension, renal failure, ischemic heart disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The frequency of acute mucositis grade 3 and 4. Timepoint: 7, 14,21,28, 35, 42 and 49 days after intervention. Method of measurement: History and physical examination.;The frequency of neutropenia. Timepoint: 7, 14,21,28, 35, 42 and 49 days after intervention. Method of measurement: History and physical examination.;The frequency of neutropenic fever. Timepoint: 7, 14,21,28, 35, 42 and 49 days after intervention. Method of measurement: History and physical examination.;The frequency of nausea and vomiting. Timepoint: 7, 14,21,28, 35, 42 and 49 days after intervention. Method of measurement: History and physical examination.;The frequency of renal complications. Timepoint: Before intervention, 7, 14,21,28, 35, 42 and 49 days after intervention. Method of measurement: History and physical examination.;The frequency of heart complications. Timepoint: Before intervention, 7, 14,21,28, 35, 42 and 49 days after intervention. Method of measurement: History and physical examination and electrocardiogram.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The disease-free survival rate. Timepoint: 18 months after intervention. Method of measurement: The telephone follow up.;The progression-free survival rate. Timepoint: 18 months after intervention. Method of measurement: The telephone follow up.;The overall survival rate. Timepoint: 18 months after intervention. Method of measurement: The telephone follow up.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Hasan Larizadeh

Kerman University of Medical Sciences

mh.larizadeh@kmu.ac.ir+98 34 3325 7235

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026