Skip to content

Comparison of different doses of ketamine and propofol for changing the dressing in burn patients

Comparison of different doses of ketamine and propofol for sedation and analgesia for changing the dressing in burn patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20201210049672N2
Enrollment
120
Registered
2022-03-19
Start date
2022-02-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Second- and third-degree burns. Encounter for change or removal of nonsurgical wound dressing

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: First the patient will receive 1-2 mg intravenous ketamin (MFR:Sterop Co., Belgium) for induction (Each ampule contains 500 mg ketamin/10 ml
therefore, each ml contains 50 mg ketamine, which will be diluted with 4 ml distilled water). During the procedure, whenever the patient's pain score is >3 based on his/her facial expression, 1-3 ml p
therefore, each ml contains 50 mg ketamine, which will be diluted with 4 ml distilled water). Then, equal proportions of ketamine and propofol 1% (each ampule contains 200 mg propofol 1%/20 ml) will b

Sponsors

Vice-Chancellery for Research Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
15 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 15-65 years Second- and third-degree burns Burn area of 10-70% Daily dressing change before skin graft in the operating room with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1-3 Ability to speak and perceive the Persian language

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Drug addiction Respiratory and cardiac diseases Renal disorders Hypersensitivity to analgesic drugs, ketamine, and propofol History of psychiatric disorders History of seizure American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class >3

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain intensity. Timepoint: At the end of the procedure. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Sedation. Timepoint: At the end of the procedure. Method of measurement: Ramsay Sedation Scale.;Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: At the end of the procedure. Method of measurement: Poor/moderate/good/excellent.;Surgeon satisfaction. Timepoint: At the end of the procedure. Method of measurement: Poor/moderate/good/excellent.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactBibimona Razavi

Bandare-abbas University of Medical Sciences

bibimonarazavi.hums@gmail.com+98 76 3334 5009

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026