Evaluation of 2 surgical methods in tibial fracture

Comparison of results and complications of two trans-patellar and minimally invasive approaches in intramedullary nailing procedure in tibial fractures

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20201028049176N1

Enrollment

122

Registered

2020-11-19

Start date

2020-09-08

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

tibial fracture.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: Minimally invasive surgical approach to intramedullary nailing in tibial fractures. Intervention 2: Control group: Parapatellar surgical approach to intramedullar

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Close or open fracture of tibia gastillo type 1 and 2 Indication of intermedullary nailing, which was determined by 2 professors Close reduction is done and fixation with intermedullary nail

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Immunodeficiency Diabetes Malnutrition with albumin below 3.5 and BMI less than 18 multiple trauma Dirty Gastillo Type 3 Wounds

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Incisional pain and general postoperative pain and restricted postoperative knee movement and postoperative knee hematoma. Timepoint: Evaluation of pain and hematoma and restriction of knee movement at 1, 3, 12 and 24 weeks after surgery. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale; physical examination.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactHamid mehrabi

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

hamidmehrabi67@resident.mui.ac.ir+98 31 3779 1559

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026