Comparison of two fixed implants prosthetic methods on aesthetic zone in a clinical trial

Comparison of the strength of lithium disilicate hybrid abutments with titanium abutments in anterior implants of patients referred to Mashhad Dental School

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20201019049072N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-11-30

Start date

2019-09-27

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Study different implant abutments.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Group with hybrid abutmentIn: this group of patients, they have a hybrid abutment (a type 4 titanium base with lithium di silicate coupling) for the implant crown.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: single implant in esthetic zone type of implant is bone level implant surgery in two phases patient has normal occlusion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient has bruxism angular of implant is higher than 25 degree gingival height is less than 2 mm diameter of implant is less than 4 mm

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Abutment breaking. Timepoint: The year after the restoration is completed. Method of measurement: View in the mouth.;Debonding of abutment. Timepoint: The year after the restoration is completed. Method of measurement: View in the mouth.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactEhsan rastbood

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

ehsan_rastbood@yahoo.com+98 51 3882 9501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026