Skip to content

Comparison of the efficacy and possible side effects of high and standard doses of rifampin in the treatment of brucellosis

Comparison of the efficacy and possible side effects of high and standard doses of rifampin in the treatment of brucellosis, a randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20201015049030N2
Enrollment
55
Registered
2022-04-12
Start date
2022-04-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

brucellosis. Brucellosis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Doxycycline treatment 100 mg q 12h + rifampin 900-1200 mg / dayIn this group, the patient is instructed to take two rifampin 300 mg capsules every morning on an emp

Sponsors

Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
14 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Isolation of Brucella in culture of blood or bone marrow or other body fluids Positive Brucella PCR test in blood and / or body fluids or tissue samples Wright title equal to or greater than 160/1 The title of Combs Wright is at least two levels higher than Wright

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age less than 14 years- Intrinsic or acquired immunodeficiency Simultaneous with advanced or chronic heart, lung, liver and kidney diseases Pregnancy- Taking oral contraceptives Consumption of phenytoin History of receiving anti-brucellosis treatment in a recent month for more than a week Infection with local forms of malaria, endocarditis, spondylitis, meningitis, etc. Taking antibiotics more than 7 days before the visit History of allergy to doxycycline or rifampin General malaise so that the patient is not able to take medication orally.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Response to treatment. Timepoint: The second, fourth, sixth and eighth weeks after starting treatment and up to three months after treatment. Method of measurement: Patients are divided into the following three groups in terms of response to treatment:1- Complete recovery: Complete recovery is considered when the symptoms disappear with treatment and by the end of the follow-up dose, the symptoms do not return and clinical signs are not found in favor of brucellosis.Relapse: It is when the symptoms have disappeared with treatment, but in the one-year follow-up period after the end of treatment, the symptoms have returned.3 - persistence of infection or treatment failure: is when the signs and symptoms of the disease at the end of treatment are still present.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Side effects. Timepoint: The second, fourth, sixth and eighth weeks after starting treatment and up to three months after treatment. Method of measurement: Presence or absence of side effects.;Wright laboratory test. Timepoint: The second, fourth, sixth and eighth weeks after starting treatment and up to three months after treatment. Method of measurement: Based on the results of the Wright laboratory test.;Coombs test. Timepoint: The second, fourth, sixth and eighth weeks after starting treatment and up to three months after treatment. Method of measurement: Based on the results of the Coombs laboratory test.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Reza Salehi

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

salehi.mohamad3@gmail.com+98 21 6119 2811

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026