The effectiveness of metacognitive therapy and reality therapy on self-care behavior, quality of life, depression and biological variables in patients with type 2 diabetes

Comparison of the effectiveness of metacognition Versus therapeutic reality ?on the treatment of care, quality of life, depression and biological variables ?in type 2 diabetes

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20200916048737N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-10-16

Start date

2020-09-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes. Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: Reality therapy in 8 sessions, Reality therapy protocol: Session 1: Greetings and acquaintance of group members with each other, group rules and establishing emot

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

30 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Completion and signing of written consent by the subject No abuse of drugs and psychotropic drugs Age between 30-60 years More than a year has passed since the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes The minimum depression score is 8 Fasting sugar should not exceed 135 mg per deciliter HbA1c should not exceed 8% Failure to receive psychological treatment during the last 3 months Absence of severe physical diseases caused by diabetes such as kidney failure, vision and ...

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Development of severe physical diseases caused by diabetes such as kidney failure, vision and ... Receiving psychological therapies during the intervention Consumption of any sedative or neuropsychiatric drugs Increase in the dose of diabetes-related drugs More than two absences

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Depression. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the intervention and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: Beck Depression Inventory.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Quality of life. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: SF36 Health Status Questionnaire.;Self care. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: Tobert and Glasgow Self-Care Questionnaire.;Fasting blood sugar. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: blood test.;Glycosylated hemoglobin. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: Blood test.;Blood pressure. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: Analog blood pressure monitor.	—

Measure

Time frame

Quality of life. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: SF36 Health Status Questionnaire.;Self care. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: Tobert and Glasgow Self-Care Questionnaire.;Fasting blood sugar. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: blood test.;Glycosylated hemoglobin. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: Blood test.;Blood pressure. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately after the study and one month and three months later. Method of measurement: Analog blood pressure monitor.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactNiloofar Tahmouresi

Islamic Azad University

niloofartahmouresi@yahoo.com+98 26 3418 2301

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026