Comparison between Effects of Functional Training Program and Conventional Therapy on Postural Control and Functional Mobility in Chronic Stroke.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20200911048687N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-12-11

Start date

2020-09-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic stroke. chronic stroke

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: functional training program of 8 week for 3 times per week for 60 minute. Intervention 2: Control group: conventional therapy (AROM, PROM ) for 8 week (3times per w

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

30 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Confirmed infarct or Hemorrhagic stroke by a neurologist using either MRI or CT scan Patient who was able to follow verbal or demonstrated instruction & direction Both genders Patient who are not able to walk independently. Aged 30 – 65 years Patient after 6 months of stroke

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Unstable CVS status significant lower limb MSK condition or neurological condition other than stroke that influence posture Patients with communication barrier and cognitive impairment Any diagnosed psychological problem Unable to keep any(Sitting or Standing) position for 30 Second

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Postural control and functional mobility. Timepoint: total 8 week program and no followup.primary outcome will be measured on 8th week. Method of measurement: berg balance scale, 6 min walk test, time up and go test, trunk control measurement scale.	—

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Public ContactQurat ul ain

Ripah international university

raoannie316@gmail.com+92 42 32172454

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026