Skip to content

Comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus Glidescope for the purpose of laryngoscopy management and intubation in candidates of caesarean delivery

Comparative evaluation direct laryngoscopy versus Glidescope for the purpose of laryngoscopy management and intubation in candidates of caesarean delivery with general anesthesia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20200825048515N44
Enrollment
90
Registered
2021-10-06
Start date
2021-04-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Elective cesarean section. Delivery by elective caesarean section

Interventions

Intervention 1: The first intervention group: Patients in the first group underwent intubation using the direct Macintosh laryngoscope with Macintosh blade No. 3. Intervention 2: The second interventi

Sponsors

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women that were candidates for cesarean section under general anesthesia Class I and II classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists The gravidity of one or two Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score of equal or less than 5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The thyromental distance (TMD) was less than 6 cm The neck circumference (NC) was equal or more than 43 cm Patients with an increased intracranial pressure Any airway pathology Any cervical spinal cord injury requirement for rapid induction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of attempts for intubatio. Timepoint: At the time of intubation. Method of measurement: Number of attempts.;Time-to-intubation. Timepoint: At the time of intubation. Method of measurement: from the time the laryngoscope was inserted into the mouth to the filling of the endotracheal tube cuff and the confirmation of the insertion of the intubation with capnography.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Systolic blood pressure. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (baseline) and before laryngoscopy and in the first, third, fifth, and tenth minutes after laryngoscopy. Method of measurement: Monitoring device.;Diastolic blood pressure. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (baseline) and before laryngoscopy and in the first, third, fifth, and tenth minutes after laryngoscopy. Method of measurement: Monitoring device.;Mean Arterial Pressure. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (baseline) and before laryngoscopy and in the first, third, fifth, and tenth minutes after laryngoscopy. Method of measurement: Monitoring device.;Heart rate. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (baseline) and before laryngoscopy and in the first, third, fifth, and tenth minutes after laryngoscopy. Method of measurement: Monitoring device.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAzim Honarmand

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

honarmand@med.mui.a.ir+98 31 3620 2020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026