Comparison of two methods "ulnar nerve decompression with transposition" and "ulnar nerve decompression alone" in improving patients with cubital tunnel syndrome

Comparative evaluation of the therapeutic results of two methods of ulnar nerve decompression with transposition and ulnar nerve decompression alone in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20200825048515N17

Enrollment

Registered

2020-12-24

Start date

2020-12-07

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Lesion of ulnar nerve, unspecified upper limb

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: In this group, the patient is located in a supine position, and after closing the tourniquet or Esmarch bandage, and prepping and draping the upper part of the li

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of cubital syndrome by electromyography and nerve conduction velocity(EMG-NCV) Failure to respond to non-surgical treatments performed so far Satisfaction to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of hand surgery History of trauma penetrating the nerves of the hand History of cervical neurosurgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Symptom improvement score. Timepoint: One month, three months, six months and one year after the intervention. Method of measurement: Modified Bishop rating system.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAbolghasem Zarezadeh

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

Rashed_petro@yahoo.com+98 31 3620 2020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026