The effectiveness of Act Matrix, Act focused on compassion and hofmann's Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy on Social Anxiety Disorder

Developing a Model of Integrative Act Matrix & comparison of its effectiveness with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Focused on Self –Compassion & Cognitive-behavioral therapy based on Hofmann's model on Social Anxiety Disorder (Single-subject study with multiple baseline)

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20200816048424N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-09-09

Start date

2020-07-27

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

social anxiety disorder based on psychiatrist assessments (DSM-5).

Interventions

Intervention 1: First intervention group: Act MatrixThe protocol on matrix of acceptance and commitment therapy was developed based on the agenda (Polk & et al, 2016) for social anxiety disorder by th

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 28 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of Social Anxiety Disorder History of Disorder for Two Years Age 20 to 28 Years level of Undergraduate and Graduate Education Satisfaction and Commitment to Participate in Research, Not Participating in other Therapies at the same time

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The Absence of more than two sessions History of Psychotic or Bipolar Disorder throughout life History of Schizoid and Avoidant Personality Disorders, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Panic and Suicidal Ideation During the Last Six Months having substance or alcohol abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Scores of Social anxiety, self-compassion, psychological flexibility of acceptance and valuable practice and life are the dependent variables. Timepoint: Before the intervention, after the intervention, 2 months after the end of the intervention (follow-up). Method of measurement: the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (Heimberg, & et al,1999), the Acceptance and Practice Flexibility Questionnaire-Second Version (Bond, & et al 2011),the Self-Compassion-Short Form Scale (Raes, & et al, 2011), and the Life Questionnaire. Valuable (Wilson, & et al,2010) were used.	—

Measure

Time frame

Scores of Social anxiety, self-compassion, psychological flexibility of acceptance and valuable practice and life are the dependent variables. Timepoint: Before the intervention, after the intervention, 2 months after the end of the intervention (follow-up). Method of measurement: the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (Heimberg, & et al,1999), the Acceptance and Practice Flexibility Questionnaire-Second Version (Bond, & et al 2011),the Self-Compassion-Short Form Scale (Raes, & et al, 2011), and the Life Questionnaire. Valuable (Wilson, & et al,2010) were used.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
There is no secondary outcome variable. Timepoint: Single-subject design with multiple baseline with repeated measurements. Method of measurement: The varyable were analyzed by visual mapping, recovery percentage, stable change index, and six clinical performance indices.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactHamid Asadi

Islamic Azad University

hamid_asadi4517@yahoo.com+98 912 514 2427

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026