Skip to content

"Peritoneal closure in laparotomy"

Comparison of peritoneal closure vs non-closure after non-infected elective laparotomy with midline incision

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20200404046936N2
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-04-28
Start date
2020-04-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

peritoneum closure in laparatomy.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Closure group in which the peritoneum is closed with absorbable sutures and then the abdominal fascia is closed. Intervention 2: Control group: non-closure group in

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Laparotomy with midline incision Age of equal or greater than 16

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Prior history of laparotomy Diabetes mellitus Known connective tissue disorders Infection Obstetrics surgery Emergency cases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Post-op pain. Timepoint: days 1, 2 and 3 post-op. Method of measurement: visual analogue scale.;Analgesic need. Timepoint: days 1, 2 and 3 post-op. Method of measurement: injection doses.;Infection. Timepoint: first post-op week. Method of measurement: observation.;Duration of hospitalization. Timepoint: first post-op week. Method of measurement: observation.;Bowel adhesion. Timepoint: 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: sonography device.;Incisional hernia. Timepoint: 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Sonography device.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactArash Mohammadi Tofigh

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

arash_mtofigh@yahoo.com+98 21 7758 5851

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026