The effect of Pain Neuroscience Education technique on Nonspecific chronic low back pain

The comparison of lumbosacral manipulation with and without pain neuroscience education method in treatment of nonspecific chronic low back pain in athlete with sacroiliac dysfunction

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20200218046542N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-06-02

Start date

2020-06-04

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic low back pain with sacroiliac dysfunction. Low back pain

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Performing sacroiliac and lumbar manipulation similar to the control group with a pain neuroscience education technique that teaches about pain management and contr

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 32 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Non-specific chronic low back pain Who performed specialized exercise at least three times a week for two hours each session Pain between 3 to 6 based on the NRS Functional disability between 20 to 40 based on the ODI questionnaire Catastrophizing pain between 26 and 39 based on the PCS questionnaire sacroiliac dysfunction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient dissatisfaction Do additional therapy in addition to the treatment specified in the study Patients who are included in one of the cases of absolute non-use of interventions such as Recent infections, cancer, use anticoagulants, lymphedema, etc. History of spine surgery Osteoporosis Leg length difference Use of painkillers and anti-inflammatory drugs over the past three months Recent physiotherapy in the past three months Spinal deformities including scoliosis Cauda equina syndrome Neurological symptoms from pressure on the nerve Disc herniation Pregnancy Inability to read and write Having medical or paramedical information (such as neuroanatomy-neurophysiology information)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain intensity. Timepoint: Before, after 3 sessions and after one month. Method of measurement: Numerical rate scale.;Functional disabilities. Timepoint: Before, after 3 sessions and after one month. Method of measurement: Oswestry disability index.;Pain catasrophizing rate. Timepoint: Before, after 3 sessions and after one month. Method of measurement: pain catastrophizing scale questionnare.;Static balance with closed eyes. Timepoint: Before,after 3 sessions and after one month. Method of measurement: Single leg stance bilateraly with closed eyes.	—

Measure

Time frame

Pain intensity. Timepoint: Before, after 3 sessions and after one month. Method of measurement: Numerical rate scale.;Functional disabilities. Timepoint: Before, after 3 sessions and after one month. Method of measurement: Oswestry disability index.;Pain catasrophizing rate. Timepoint: Before, after 3 sessions and after one month. Method of measurement: pain catastrophizing scale questionnare.;Static balance with closed eyes. Timepoint: Before,after 3 sessions and after one month. Method of measurement: Single leg stance bilateraly with closed eyes.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohamad Mahdi Soltani

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

m_soltani@sums.ac.ir+98 71 3720 7692

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026