laryngeal mask implantation with three anterior airway maneuvers and classical method

Evaluation and comparison of success rate in laryngeal mask implantation with three anterior airway maneuvers and classical method

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20200217046523N15

Enrollment

110

Registered

2021-05-05

Start date

2021-05-09

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia with laryngeal mask. Failed or difficult intubation

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: In this group, patients undergo intubation through the laryngeal mask using three airway maneuvers from the front. After intubation, the success rate of intubatio

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 20 to 80 years ASA classification I or II Weight 40-80 kg Body mass index less than 35 Mouth opening at least 25 mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Mouth opening less than 25 mm Pregnancy Supraglottic anatomical abnormalities Neck extension restrictions Cervical spine deformity Dysphagia Existence of sore throat

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Success rate in intubation. Timepoint: After trying to intubate. Method of measurement: Examination.;Complications of intubation. Timepoint: After trying to intubate. Method of measurement: Examination.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactHamidreza Shetai

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

hamidshetabi@med.mui.ac.ir+98 31 3668 0048

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026