Correction of Crooked Nose

Comparison Between Double Lateral Osteotomy and Asymmetric Dorsal Hump Reduction in Correction of Crooked Nose

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20200123046232N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-02-22

Start date

2017-09-23

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crooked nose.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Patients undergoing double lateral osteotomy. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Patients undergoing asymmetrical dorsal hump reduction.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with Crooked Nose

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: S Shape Deformity of Nose Facial Asymmetry Cartilage Deformity

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Measurement of difference in degree of nasal deviation before and after surgery. Timepoint: Baseline (before intervention), 6 and 12 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Degree of nasal deviation using patient's photography.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: 12 months after surgery. Method of measurement: questionnaire.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSara Nouri

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

nourisara@sbmu.ac.ir+98 21 2267 6231

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026