Skip to content

Evaluating the efficacy of phonemic training in cochlear implant users

Evaluation of the efficacy and efficiency of phonemic training programs in auditory processing status of prelingually deaf children with Cochlear implant: a single subject study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20200120046209N1
Enrollment
15
Registered
2020-04-14
Start date
2020-01-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Children with hearing loss. Unspecified hearing loss, unspecified ear

Interventions

Intervention group: Persian-speaking children 8-11 years old with cochlear implant.

Sponsors

Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
8 Years to 11 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy peripheral auditory system Healthy hearing system Normal IQ based on Wechsler Intelligence Test No history of chronic otitis media Right hand based on the Edinburgh Handwriting Questionnaire Persian-language monolingual

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non-participation in evaluation sessions Individual or parent's unwillingness to participate in research Middle ear infection between test and retest Fatigue, reduction or lack of attention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Phoneme recognition test: It is a test specifically designed to evaluate phonological level auditory processing ability in cochlear implant users. Timepoint: The score is a percentage obtained through testing and observation. The test will be conducted eight weeks before the intervention phase, during the intervention phase once time every week, once a week after the intervention phase for eight-week. Method of measurement: Phoneme recognition score based on PRT, Quantitative score based on PST, Qualitative score based on PST, Qualifiers representing buffalo model subcategories based on PST, Speech discrimination score based on WRS, Patterns, and frequency of phoneme errors including omission, substitution, added and total based on PEA.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Phoneme synthesis Test: Presenting a phoneme to a phoneme is a meaningful (or nonsensical) word in which the listener is obliged to stick these phonemes together and to express the word forming it. Timepoint: The raw data points are obtained through testing and observation. This test will be performed before the intervention once a week for eight weeks, during the intervention once a week for eight weeks and after the intervention once a week for eight weeks. Method of measurement: The 54 words in the one-to-four syllable that are referred to as full-color images form the test items. The general requirements for word assignment are frequency testing, high imaging capability and specific item allocation conditions are consistent with the test objectives. Among the vocabulary assigned to this test are 31 single syllables, 18 binary syllables, three syllables, and one quadratic syllable, and 29 end-of-sentence words.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSahar Shomeil Shushtari

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Sshomeil@gmail.com+98 61 3374 3506

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026