Fractional Erb-YAG laser versus combined fractional Erb-YAG laser and local platelet-rich plasma in facial rejuvenation

Fractional Erb-YAG laser versus combined fractional Erb-YAG laser and local platelet-rich plasma in facial rejuvenation, in patients reffered to Shohadaye Tajrish hospital, 2019-2020

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20200107046041N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-03-30

Start date

2020-02-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Rejuvenation.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: One half of face PRP 10cc 3session 1month interval with fractional erb yag laser total fluence 60 j on cm2 pulse duration400 microsecond 3session 1month interval.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

35 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women 60-35 years Mild to moderate wrinkles at rest

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Male gender Under 35 and over 60 years of age Breastfeeding and pregnancy Perform other facial cosmetic procedures like Botox, Derm abrasion, Chemical Peeling and Face Lift in the past 6 months Oral isotretinoin in the past 6 months6- History of colloid formation Not willing to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Wrinkle removal. Timepoint: Patients are monitored for reviscometer and digital imaging in the first session (baseline), second and third treatment, and 3 months after the last laser session. Method of measurement: The results are evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively: In the qualitative method, the patients are photographed with the same digital camera before the start of the project and then at each visit. The improvement is in the percentage of zero to one hundred. Finally, the rate of recovery is defined as No response (less than 10%), mild response (10-25%), moderate response (25-50%) and good response (50-75%) Excellent response (over 75%) Is. Quantitative testing is done by the multi probe adapter system MPA5. MPA5 is a device for checking the suitability of various biophysical parameters of the skin. Using Reviscometer based on Resonance running time acoustic waves and mechanical properties of skin are measured skin resonance time and thus determine the biological age of the skin at different angles.	—

Measure

Time frame

Wrinkle removal. Timepoint: Patients are monitored for reviscometer and digital imaging in the first session (baseline), second and third treatment, and 3 months after the last laser session. Method of measurement: The results are evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively: In the qualitative method, the patients are photographed with the same digital camera before the start of the project and then at each visit. The improvement is in the percentage of zero to one hundred. Finally, the rate of recovery is defined as No response (less than 10%), mild response (10-25%), moderate response (25-50%) and good response (50-75%) Excellent response (over 75%) Is. Quantitative testing is done by the multi probe adapter system MPA5. MPA5 is a device for checking the suitability of various biophysical parameters of the skin. Using Reviscometer based on Resonance running time acoustic waves and mechanical properties of skin are measured skin resonance time and thus determine the biological age of the skin at different angles.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Arash Rahbar

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Arashrahbar10@gmail.com+98 21 25719

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026