Skip to content

Evaluation of inter maxillary fixation’s impact on skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery

Evaluation of intermaxillary fixation’s impact on skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery:A randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20191126045510N1
Enrollment
56
Registered
2020-01-26
Start date
2020-02-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

subjects in this study were patients with mandibular hypoplasia.. Mandibular hypoplasia

Interventions

Intervention 1: control group: skeletal class II patents with 5 -10 mm skeletal discrepancy undergo mandibular advancement orthognathic surgery with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with Dalpont's t

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
17 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients with skeletal class II requiring mandibular advancement surgery (5 -10 mm advancement) patients with completed presurgical orthodontic treatment patients with postpubertal skeletal maturity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients who had synchronized maxillary orthognatic surgery patients with poorly controlled systematic disease such as diabetes melitus, etc. patients with previous anti resorptive drug such bisposphonates, etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Me- y axis: It is the distance between Menthon and Y-Axis on cephalogram. Timepoint: It is evaluated in three time periods: before intervention (T0), one week after intervention (T1) and one year after intervention (T2). Method of measurement: it would be evaluated by standard metallic ruler based on distance between cephalometric reference points on lateral cephalograms.;B-Y axis: It is the distance between B point and Y-Axis on cephalogram. Timepoint: It is evaluated in three time periods: before intervention (T0), one week after intervention (T1) and one year after intervention (T2). Method of measurement: it would be evaluated by standard metallic ruler based on distance between cephalometric reference points on lateral cephalograms.;Pog -Y axis: It is the distance between Pog and Y-Axis on cephalom. Timepoint: It is evaluated in three time periods: before intervention (T0), one week after intervention (T1) and one year after intervention (T2). Method of measurement: it would be evaluated by standard metallic ruler based on distance between cephalometric reference points on lateral cephalograms.;Me- X axis: It is the distance between Menthon and X-Axis on cephalogram. Timepoint: It is evaluated in three time periods: before intervention (T0), one week after intervention (T1) and one year after intervention (T2). Method of measurement: it would be evaluated by standard metallic ruler based on distance between cephalometric reference points on lateral cephalograms.;B-X axis: It is the distance between B point and X-Axis on cephalogram. Timepoint: It is evaluated in three time periods: before intervention (T0), one week after intervention (T1) and one year after intervention (T2). Method of measurement: it would be evaluated by standard metallic ruler based on distance between cephalometric reference points on lateral cephalograms.;Pog -X axis: It is the distance between Pog and X-Axis on cephalogram. Timepoint: It is evaluated in three time periods: before inte

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public Contactreza tabrizi

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

rtabrizi@sbmu.ac.ir+98 21 2240 3075

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026