Comparison of the effectiveness of biological amniotic membrane dressing with conventional ones

Comparison of the effectiveness of biological amniotic membrane dressing with conventional ones in acute burn wounds

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20191102045308N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-03-11

Start date

2020-01-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Burns. Burn and corrosion, body region unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: biological amniotic membrane dressing. Intervention 2: Intervention group: conventional wound dressing.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All the patients with skin burn admitted to Ali Ibn Abi Talib Hospital in Zahedan in 2020

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Immune system disorder Chronic diseases like : Diabetes Mellitus

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Burn Wound Infection. Timepoint: daily. Method of measurement: Based on evidence of burning wound infection.;Times of Morphine administration. Timepoint: daily. Method of measurement: times.;Duration of hospitalization. Timepoint: daily. Method of measurement: days.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactArsalan Shirouyeh

Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

dr.arsalanshirovyeh@zaums.ac.ir+98 54 3329 5570

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026