Skip to content

Comparison of the effect of cyclosporine and etanercept on Toxic epidermal necrolysis

Comparison of the effect of cyclosporine and etanercept on Toxic epidermal necrolysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20191020045169N1
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-02-14
Start date
2020-03-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

toxic epidermal necrolysis. Toxic epidermal necrolysis [Lyell]

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: toxic epidermal necrolysis patients, treated with etanercept 50mg(Ariogen pharmed) single dose subcutaneously on their first day of admission. Intervention 2: Inter

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis confirmed by a dermatologist.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients with any acquired or congenital immune deficiency. patients with stage 3 or 4 of heart failure. patients with uncontrolled hypertension. patients with renal failure. patients with known hypersensitivity to these drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Leisions re-epithelialization of the toxic epidermal necrolysis. Timepoint: daily, during patients admission. Method of measurement: by dermatologist examination and taking standard pictures from patients lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mortality rate of the patients. Timepoint: During their admission in the hospital. Method of measurement: SCORTEN index.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFarnaz Araghi

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

farnazaraghi@sbmu.ac.ir+98 21 5541 9005

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026