Maxillary Primary Molars Anaesthesia

Comparison of Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine on Depth of Anaesthesia in Maxillary Primary Molars Teeth

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20191002044953N1

Enrollment

Registered

2019-12-26

Start date

2019-12-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effectiveness of articaine in comparison to lidocaine during maxillary primary molars extraction.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Injection of 1.8 ml of 4% articaine with 1:100000 epinephrine in buccal infiltration. Intervention 2: Control group: Injection of 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:100

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

6 Years to 9 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children who require bilateral extraction of primary maxillary molars Children with grade 3 or 4 of frankl behavior rating scale Unrestorable primary maxillary molars primary maxillary molars with at least one third of the root length Children without systemic disease or drug allergy Children with ability of communication in persian language Children without learning disability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Uncooperative children Teeth with acute abscess Use of analgesics before treatment Failure in complete anaesthesia after injection

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Score of self-reported pain by children during maxillary primary molars extraction based on Wong Baker Facial Pain Scale after anaesthesia with lidocaine or articaine. Timepoint: After tooth exrtraction. Method of measurement: Wong Baker Facial Pain Scale.;Calculated score of child pain by investigator during maxillary primary molars extraction based on Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability Scale after anaesthesia with lidocaine or articaine. Timepoint: During tooth exrtraction. Method of measurement: Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability Scale.	—

Measure

Time frame

Score of self-reported pain by children during maxillary primary molars extraction based on Wong Baker Facial Pain Scale after anaesthesia with lidocaine or articaine. Timepoint: After tooth exrtraction. Method of measurement: Wong Baker Facial Pain Scale.;Calculated score of child pain by investigator during maxillary primary molars extraction based on Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability Scale after anaesthesia with lidocaine or articaine. Timepoint: During tooth exrtraction. Method of measurement: Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability Scale.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Blood pressure changes before and after tooth extraction. Timepoint: before and after tooth extraction. Method of measurement: Blood prassure monitor.;Pulse rate changes before and after tooth extraction. Timepoint: Before and after tooth extraction. Method of measurement: Pulse Oximeter.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactNahid Maghsoudi

Yazd University of Medical Sciences

nahidmaghsoodi@yahoo.com+98 35 3621 4257

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026