Efficacy of Ankle Foot Orthosis on center of mass

Comparison the efficacy of newly designed hinged Ankle Foot Orthosis with solid Ankle Foot Orthosis on center of mass fluctuation in hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy patients

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20190919044818N1

Enrollment

Registered

2023-03-18

Start date

2023-06-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cerebral palsy. cerebral palsy

Interventions

Intervention group: Hydro Pneumatic Ankle Foot Orthosis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Using solid Ankle Foot Orthosis Ability to walk at independently with or without Ankle Foot Orthosis Gross Motion Functional Measurement (GMFM) between 1 to 2 Plantar flexor spasticity between 1 to 2 according to Ashworth scale Ability to perform 5 degree dorsiflexion actively or passively

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: People with cognitive problems People with Botulism toxin injection in recent 9 month People with fixed contracture in lower limbs joints

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Mechanical energy including potential and kinetic. Timepoint: Before and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Motion analysis and force plate.;Mechanical positive and negative work. Timepoint: Before and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Motion analysis and force plate.;Joint power. Timepoint: Before and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Motion analysis and force plate.	—

Measure

Time frame

Mechanical energy including potential and kinetic. Timepoint: Before and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Motion analysis and force plate.;Mechanical positive and negative work. Timepoint: Before and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Motion analysis and force plate.;Joint power. Timepoint: Before and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Motion analysis and force plate.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Joint power. Timepoint: Before and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Motion analysis and force plate.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactEnsieh Pourhoseingholi

Hamedan University of Medical Sciences

ensiehpmd@yahoo.com+98 21 4480 3255

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026