Skip to content

Comparison of the effect of orthosis with or without local vibration system on thoracic kyphosis angle, back extensor muscle strength, pain and walking ability in hyperkyphotic older adults.

Design and fabrication of an intelligent local vibration system and A comparison between the effect of conventional TLO and TLO fitted with local vibration therapy system on Kyphosis angle, isometric strength of back extensor muscles and pain in Hyperkyphotic elderly.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20190811044505N2
Enrollment
18
Registered
2023-02-14
Start date
2023-05-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperkyphosis. Other secondary kyphosis, thoracic region

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: intervention group receives Spinal orthosis with imbedded local vibration system. this orthosis mechanically equal with control group orthosis but local vibration s

Sponsors

University of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
59 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age more than 59 years. kyphosis angle more than 50 degree and less than 80 degree Body mass index between 25 and 33 ability of independent walking without any assistive devices ability of wearing orthosis independently patients that they aren't in acute phase of osteoporosis and had not new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in recent 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Muscle recovery drugs use. Having any previous spinal surgery . Patients that their Hyperkyphosis is due to trauma or other disease like metastasis, Scheuerman kyphosis, scoliosis or any other inborn spinal malalignments like hemivertebra. Patients that had spinal severe pathologies like infection, tumor, spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis or any spinal degenerative disease like osteoarthritis. Patients that had severe or referral pain related to spine or spinal stenosis. Patients that had unstable cardiovascular, mental or neurologic disease or use of pace maker.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Thoracic kyphosis angle. Timepoint: Thoracic kyphosis angle measure before intervention and 21 and 42 days after orthosis use. Method of measurement: Photogrammetry.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Back extensor muscles strength. Timepoint: Back extensor muscle strength measure before intervention and 21 and 42 days after orthosis use. Method of measurement: Force gauge.;Pain. Timepoint: Pain measure before intervention and 21 and 42 days after orthosis use. Method of measurement: Visual analog scale.;Walking speed. Timepoint: Walking speed measure before intervention and 21 and 42 days after orthosis use. Method of measurement: 10 meter walk test, 2 minute walk test.;Physical function. Timepoint: Physical function measure before intervention and 21 and 42 days after orthosis use. Method of measurement: Timed up and go test.;Health condition. Timepoint: Health condition will measure before intervention. Method of measurement: SF-36 Health survey questionnaire.;Orthosis comfort. Timepoint: Orthosis comfort measure before intervention and 42 days after orthosis use. Method of measurement: Orthosis comfort personalized questionnaire.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFatemeh Keshavarzi

University of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences

keshavarzifatemeh999@gmail.com+98 21 2218 0083

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026