Skip to content

Comparison of nanosilver spray with silorsulfadiazine ointment in burns

Evaluation of the Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect of Nanosilver Spray with Silversolfadiazin Ointment on Burnt Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20190618043934N4
Enrollment
66
Registered
2020-06-19
Start date
2020-06-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burning. Calcification and ossification of muscles associated with burns

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Use a nanosilver spray when replacing a burn wound dressing (spray on the wound site to wet the entire burn wound). Intervention 2: Intervention group: Use of Silve

Sponsors

Birjand University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Having conscious consent of the patient or his close companion to enter the study Minimum hemoglobin mg / dl 12 Grade 2 and 3 burns Percentage of thermal burns below 20% Failure to perform surgery to wash and burn the burn before visiting the hospital Ability to answer questions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Wound size. Timepoint: Zero day (hospitalization) and day 7 after hospitalization. Method of measurement: The size of the patient's wound will be measured based on the Betsy Jensen checklist.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Wound infection. Timepoint: 3 and 6 days after hospitalization. Method of measurement: Sampling of the wound by a sterile swab using the Levine technique.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactZabihullah Mohaghegh

Birjand University of Medical Sciences

oabstudent@gmail.com+98 56 3232 3232

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026