In the study of Lyon et al., A randomized study between two groups of Direct laryngoscope and Video laryngoscope in emergent patients was done.Two groups of trained students, one group of Video laryngoscope and the others of Direct laryngoscope used.85 patients who needed emergency intubation were included in the study. Finally, in terms of the duration of intubation, the mean intake in Direct laryngoscopy who had the mean time 25.9 second and the other group was 30.4 second. Regarding the short
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Intervention group: Patients who need surgery under video Laryngoscopy are intubated. Laryngoscope for first year anesthesia assistants Theorical and practical classes in the classroom
Sponsors
Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: The patient with condition of General Anesthesia by Intubation Patient satisfaction for participate in the study The patient ASA is 1 and 2 Candidate for Elective Surgery Age of patients between 18 till 70 years old
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Change in Intubation for example Rapid Sequence Intubation Emergent patient Anatomical disorders of mouth or tounge or face The patient has a Cardio pulmonary disease The patient has a Cold
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Duration of Intubation and its success rate. Timepoint: Intra intubation. Method of measurement: Stopwatch, Seeing. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Hemodynamic status. Timepoint: Intra Intubation and 4 and 12 hours after operation. Method of measurement: Barometer, Questionnaire. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactPedram Golestaneh
Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed