Skip to content

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing in Accordance with the AIM Model and Family Empowerment Model Based on Self-Compassion in treatment of diabetes

Comparison of the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing in Accordance with the AIM model and Family Empowerment model Based on Self-Compassion on Adherence to Treatment, Self-Care, Health-Related Quality of life Dependent Diabetes and Glycosylated Hemoglobin in Patients with Diabetes II

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20190528043744N1
Enrollment
150
Registered
2019-10-12
Start date
2019-02-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with type II diabetes. Diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition

Interventions

Intervention 1: The intervention group 1: Drug treatments and 8 sessions of motivational interviewing in accordance with AIM model receive 2 to 2.5 hours and twice a week. Intervention 2: Intervention

Sponsors

Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
30 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age range 30-55 years Having diabetes type 2 for at least six months with a specialist physician diagnosis Higher education than the cycle Not using other treatment psychotherapy programs and changing medications during the research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Have other types of diabetes Have severe diabetic complications that prevent research Acute or chronic medical illness that may cause problems with blood sampling

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The effectiveness of motivational interviewing of the AIM model in adherence to treatment. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Morisky's adherence treatment questionnaire.;The effectiveness of motivational interviewing of the AIM model in self-care. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Short-term scale of Tobert's diabetics self-care activities.;The effectiveness of motivational interviewing of the AIM model in quality of life. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Wang's Quality of Life Questionnaire of Diabetes.;The effectiveness of motivational interviewing of the AIM model in glycosylated hemoglobin. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Blood test.;The effectiveness of Family Empowerment Model Based on Self-Compassion on adherence to treatment. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Morisky's adherence treatment questionnaire.;The effectiveness of Family Empowerment Model Based on Self-Compassion on self-care. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Short-term scale of Tobert's diabetics self-care activities.;The effectiveness of Family Empowerment Model Based on Self-Compassion on quality of life. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Wang's Quality of Life Questionnaire of Diabetes.;The effectiveness of Family Empowerment Model Based on Self-Compassion on glycosylated hemoglobin. Timepoint: Before

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Adherence of treatment. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Morisky's adherence treatment questionnaire.;The amount of self-care. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Short-term scale of Tobert's diabetics self-care activities.;Level of quality of life. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Wang's quality of life questionnaire of diabetes.;Amount of glycosylated hemoglobin. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Blood test.;Score of self-compassion. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: The scale of self-compassion.;Score of the coping styles. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Lazarus coping strategies questionnaire.;Score of perceived social support. Timepoint: Before an intervention, immediately after the intervention, 3 months after the end of intervention. Method of measurement: Multidimensional scale of Ziment perceived social support.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSoheila Rahmani

Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch

soheilarahmani_sh@gmail.com+98 21 5532 8101

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026