Skip to content

Spinal Anaesthesia with Bupivacaine versus Ropivacaine in Caesarean section

Comparison of the effect of intrathecal Bupivacaine with intrathecal Ropivacaine on Hemodynamic of patients under Elective Caesarean Section

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20190506043495N1
Enrollment
72
Registered
2019-05-18
Start date
2019-05-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Anaesthesia in Caesarean section.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Amp. Bupivacaine 0.5% 12.5 mg, Single dose, Intrathecally. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Amp. Ropivacaine 0.5%, 17.5 mg, Single dose, Intrathecally.

Sponsors

Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Term Pregnant women 18 - 40 Y/O Physical health class (ASA score): 1-2 Candidated for Caesarean section

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Dissatisfaction of Patient for Spinal Anaesthesia Presence of Contraindication for Regional Anaesthesia Pre-term or post-term pregnancy Age40 y/o Physical health class (ASA score) > 2 Urgency surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Heart rate. Timepoint: Before Spinal Anaesthesia and every 2 minutes interval after Spinal Anaesthesia. Method of measurement: Heart monitoring device.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Systolic blood pressure. Timepoint: Before Spinal Anaesthesia and every 2 minutes interval after Spinal Anaesthesia. Method of measurement: Non invasive automated blood pressure device.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Ahmad ghazi

Ardabil University of Medical Sciences

alavi@arums.ac.ir+98 45 3324 8888

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026