Designing and examining the effectiveness of two interventions for reading problems in students with dyslexia

Designing and comparing the effectiveness of two kinds of reading interventions in persian 9-12 years old students with dyslexia

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20190504043467N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-06-15

Start date

2020-05-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyslexia. specific developmental disorders of scholastic skills (F81.-)

Interventions

Group 1: multi-component Group 2: comprehension based Multi-component intervention: This intervention will be done in 36 sessions, each session would be taken 45 minutes. 18 sessions for phonological

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

9 Years to 12 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Persian language 9 - 12 years old students whit dyslexia in Tehran

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The first language of the students with dyslexia isn't Persian

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
NEMA test scor. Timepoint: Before and after of intervention. Method of measurement: NEMA test of reading and dyslexia NEMA test is a standard test for girls and boys in primary school in order to identify children with problems with reading and dyslexia. It has been standardized in 1614 students in five elementary schools in Iran. The reliability of it was calculated using Cronbach's alpha method, and its values for different subtests were obtained between 0.43 and 0.98. Sub-tests of this scale include the reading of words, the reading of meaningless words, the word chain test, the perception of words, the text perception test, the rhyme test, the naming test, the removal of the voices test, Letter test and sign test are words that their Cronbach's alpha in this study were 0.91, 0.85, 0.78, 66 / 0.78, 0.75, 0.88, 0.61, 0.65, 0.65 and 0.75 respectively. This test was performed individually and according to its cut off point 157, students who scored 157 or less than 157 (114 errors or more) in this test, were identified as dyslexic students. To be Cronbach's alpha is 0.71 .Teacher's Questionnaire: Content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by the professors of Tarbiat Moallem University in Iran. The reliability of this study was also reported by the Madsige Research Group through Cronbach's alpha of over 70%.	—

Measure

Time frame

NEMA test scor. Timepoint: Before and after of intervention. Method of measurement: NEMA test of reading and dyslexia NEMA test is a standard test for girls and boys in primary school in order to identify children with problems with reading and dyslexia. It has been standardized in 1614 students in five elementary schools in Iran. The reliability of it was calculated using Cronbach's alpha method, and its values for different subtests were obtained between 0.43 and 0.98. Sub-tests of this scale include the reading of words, the reading of meaningless words, the word chain test, the perception of words, the text perception test, the rhyme test, the naming test, the removal of the voices test, Letter test and sign test are words that their Cronbach's alpha in this study were 0.91, 0.85, 0.78, 66 / 0.78, 0.75, 0.88, 0.61, 0.65, 0.65 and 0.75 respectively. This test was performed individually and according to its cut off point 157, students who scored 157 or less than 157 (114 errors or more) in this test, were identified as dyslexic students. To be Cronbach's alpha is 0.71 .Teacher's Questionnaire: Content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by the professors of Tarbiat Moallem University in Iran. The reliability of this study was also reported by the Madsige Research Group through Cronbach's alpha of over 70%.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Zahra Soleymani

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

soleymaniz@tums.ac.ir+98 21 7753 3939

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026