Comparison of two methods of respiratory support in neonates

Comparison of the consequences of using two methods of "continuous positive airway pressure" and "high frequency oscillation" in the treatment of respiratory distress in premature neonates

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20190416043290N2

Enrollment

Registered

2020-12-17

Start date

2020-12-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

respiratory distress of neonates. Respiratory distress of newborn

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: Infants with a gestational age of 28-34 weeks, weighing less than 2000 grams and hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit with a diagnosis of respiratory

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

No minimum to 28 Days

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All premature neonates (gestational age of 28-34 weeks) Neonates with birth weight less than 2000 gr. Hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit due to respiratory distress during the first 24 hours after birth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe asphyxia (apgar of minutes 5 less than or equal to 6) Positive blood culture upon arrival at the neonatal intensive care unit Congenital malformations (whether pulmonary or extrapulmonary)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Success or failure of any method. Timepoint: Maximum 3 days. Method of measurement: Need for endotracheal intubation or pulmonary or extrapulmonary complications.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactRaheleh Moradi

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

raheleh.moradi1987@gmail.com+98 21 6119 2357

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026