anesthetic efficacy.
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Intervention group: Randomly a second primary molar on one side of the jaw is anesthetized by buccal infiltration technique with Articaine. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Random
Sponsors
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
3 Years to 6 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 3-6 year-old non-cooperative children (negative or completely negative based on Frankel scale) A child with ASA Class I systemic status has 2 mandibular decayed second molar teeth on the right and left sides, without clinical or radiographic symptoms, with the possibility of pulpotomy after caries removal. The patient needs to undergo at least 2 similar dental treatment sessions with local anesthesia
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: History of any clinical symptoms such as spontaneous pain, soft tissue swelling, fistula, mobility of primary second molar teeth or abnormal bleeding during access cavity preparation. Radiographic symptoms such as internal and external pathological resorption, radiolucency of the periapical area or furcation or physiological resorption of more than 1/3 of the root length. History of cold in the last 14 days Any adverse drug reaction to local anesthetics or sedatives
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comprison of anesthetic efficacy of Buccal Infilteration versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve block. Timepoint: Comparison of the effectiveness of infiltration and block anesthesia technique in two treatment sessions. Method of measurement: according to Nonverbal pain scale revised. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactTaraneh Faghihi
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed