The impacts of a peer-led and a nurse-led self-management program on the subject well-being

Comparison of the impacts of a peer-led and a nurse-led self-management program on the subject well-being of patients with multiple sclerosis

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20190305042926N1

Enrollment

Registered

2019-03-14

Start date

2018-12-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subjective well-being in multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple sclerosis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: In this study, there are two nurse-led education and peer-led education groups that receive self-management program. For this, in the nurse-led education group, pat

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria:Satisfaction to participate in the study Having reading and writing skills Ages between 20 to 45 years Spending at least one year of diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by specialist doctors Not having a history of participation in educational programs related to self-management and psychology Having a recurrence-remission type disease during the study, approved by a neurologist Expanded Disability Status Scale be between 0.5 and 5.5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participant dissatisfaction to attend the study Having other acute or chronic physical, mental or psychiatric disorders such as severe depression.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Subjective well-being. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately at the end of the intervention, as well as two months after the intervention. Method of measurement: In the study of comparison of the impacts of a peer-led and a nurse-led self-management program on the subject well-being of patients with multiple sclerosis for measuring the subjective two well-being, the scale of positive and negative experience balance and satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) will be used.	—

Measure

Time frame

Subjective well-being. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately at the end of the intervention, as well as two months after the intervention. Method of measurement: In the study of comparison of the impacts of a peer-led and a nurse-led self-management program on the subject well-being of patients with multiple sclerosis for measuring the subjective two well-being, the scale of positive and negative experience balance and satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) will be used.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Life satisfaction. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately at the end of the intervention, as well as two months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS).;Positive and negative affect. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately at the end of the intervention, as well as two months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Scale of positive and negative experience balance.	—

Measure

Time frame

Life satisfaction. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately at the end of the intervention, as well as two months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS).;Positive and negative affect. Timepoint: Before the intervention, immediately at the end of the intervention, as well as two months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Scale of positive and negative experience balance.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMaryam Azizi

Birjand University of Medical Sciences

azizi.m@bums.ac.ir+98 56 3238 1410

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026