Efficacy of group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in patients with breast cancer

Efficacy of group-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Self-differentiation,Emotion disregulation, Fear of disease progression and mental health in patients with breast cancer

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20181209041894N1

Enrollment

Registered

2018-12-23

Start date

2017-11-30

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effect of ACT Group Therapy on Patients with Breast Cancer. F40-F48

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Treatment based on the acceptance and commitment of the third-generation psychotherapy method, which lasts for eight 90-minute sessions. Duration of the interventio

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

25 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Age between 25 and 60 - People under chemotherapy - Apart from cancer, there is no physical or psychological illness - Absence in other courses at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having other cancers Inability to attend meetings due to physical illness A history of acute mental illness with a psychiatrist's opinion

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Percentage of people who have a self-differentiating questionnaire score of under 70. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before the intervention), the end of the study, two months later. Method of measurement: Dreik-Mordak self-differentiation questionnaire.;The percentage of people who score in the difficulty questionnaire in adjusting their excitement of Gertz and Roemer are over 108. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before the intervention), the end of the. Method of measurement: Gritz & Roemer's Thrill Setting Questionnaire.;Percentage of people whose FOP-Q questionnaire score is above 74. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before the intervention), the end of the. Method of measurement: , FOP-Q Questionnaire.;The percentage of people with a general health questionnaire score of 28 (GHQ-28) is above 42. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before the intervention), the end of the. Method of measurement: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28).	—

Measure

Time frame

Percentage of people who have a self-differentiating questionnaire score of under 70. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before the intervention), the end of the study, two months later. Method of measurement: Dreik-Mordak self-differentiation questionnaire.;The percentage of people who score in the difficulty questionnaire in adjusting their excitement of Gertz and Roemer are over 108. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before the intervention), the end of the. Method of measurement: Gritz & Roemer's Thrill Setting Questionnaire.;Percentage of people whose FOP-Q questionnaire score is above 74. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before the intervention), the end of the. Method of measurement: , FOP-Q Questionnaire.;The percentage of people with a general health questionnaire score of 28 (GHQ-28) is above 42. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (before the intervention), the end of the. Method of measurement: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28).

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMaryam Hasannezhad

Islamic Azad University

maryam.hasannegzad@gmail.com+98 33340605

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026