FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the success rate of semi-sitting position in comparison with the resting position in emergency intubation

Comparison of the success rate of semi-sitting position in comparison with the resting position in emergency intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20181203041838N1
Enrollment
162
Registered
2019-07-23
Start date
2018-02-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergency intubation. Failed or difficult intubation

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Tracheal intubation in semi-setting position at 25-degree angle. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Tracheal intubation in semi-setting position at 35-degree angle

Sponsors

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Informed consent of patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Need to surgery for intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of examinations for tracheal intubation. Timepoint: After intervention. Method of measurement: Direct observation.;Cormack-Lehane score. Timepoint: During intervention. Method of measurement: Direct observation.;Heart rate. Timepoint: During intervention. Method of measurement: Pulse meter.;Sistolic blood pressure. Timepoint: During intervention. Method of measurement: Blood pressure monitor.;Diastolic blood pressure. Timepoint: During intervention. Method of measurement: Blood pressure monitor.—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAmir Reza Hoshmand

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

amir.hm88@gmail.com+98 31 3668 8138

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026