Comparison of the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy and schema therapy in women with fibromyalgia

Comparison of the effectiveness of group acceptance and commitment therapy and group schema therapy on perceived stress, pain perception, pain catastrophizing, depression and symptoms severity of women with fibromyalgia

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20181201041810N1

Enrollment

Registered

2019-03-12

Start date

2019-03-06

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: group acceptance and commitment therapy that will be performed in 8 sessions and once a week. Along with routine drug therapy. Intervention 2: Intervention group: g

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

25 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of fibromyalgia by rheumatology specialist Conscious willingness and willingness to participate in the research project Age range 25-55 Education higher than diploma No psychological treatment over the past 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having mental disorders or other chronic physical illness during the treatment process Missing more than 2 sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Perceived stress. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Perceived Stress Scale.;Pain perception. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Short – form Mc Gill Pain Questionaire.;Pain Catastrophizing. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Pain Catastrophizing Scale.;Depression. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Beck Depression Inventory-II.;Symptoms severity. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Riviesed Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire.	—

Measure

Time frame

Perceived stress. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Perceived Stress Scale.;Pain perception. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Short – form Mc Gill Pain Questionaire.;Pain Catastrophizing. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Pain Catastrophizing Scale.;Depression. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Beck Depression Inventory-II.;Symptoms severity. Timepoint: Before the beginning of intervention and after the end of intervention(after 2 months). Method of measurement: Riviesed Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactParisa Soleymani

Islamic Azad University

p62.soleymani@gmail.com+98 45 3327 1340

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026