Comparison of immediate and delayed implants

Comparative evaluation of periodontal Indices in the newly extracted alveolar cavity technique and delayed implants in patients who were candidate for implant surgery

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20181128041779N1

Enrollment

Registered

2019-01-02

Start date

2017-12-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immediate implants and delayed implants.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Immediate technique: The tooth was a-traumatically extracted and washed into saline solution and curettage. The drilling was done in the right position and the are

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

25 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age over 25 years old Having plaque index of 20% Not having an active infection at the implant site

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having systemic diseases that prevent osseointegration Having physical or mental disability or para-function Being a smoker Having Bruxism Having Clenching

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The success rate and stability of the treatment, bone resorption, having or not having radiolucency, amount of gingival bleeding, depth of pocket. Timepoint: 3-4 months after surgery, 8 months after the first examination. Method of measurement: By using papilla index, bleeding index, probing pocket depths.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Naser Sargolzaei

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Sargolzaien@mums.ac.ir+98 51 3882 9501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026